What it delivers
Tell us a subject, a region or a time period. You receive a clean list of researchers working in it right now, each one placed on a five-level seniority ladder and matched to the role that suits them.
A seniority level for every name
Senior Leader, Experienced, Rising, Mid-career or Early-career — with a short, plain reason for each placement.
A suggested role
Editor-in-chief, editorial board member, reviewer, keynote speaker or session chair, matched to the person's standing.
Current contact details
A working email for each researcher, with a note on how strongly it matches the person.
Who they are today
Current position, institution, country and the topics they are publishing on now, not ten years ago.
Leaders in every country
National leaders stand out even where worldwide rankings overlook them, so boards and programmes are truly international.
Identity you can trust
Records that may mix up two people with similar names are left out, so invitations reach the right person.
A library that keeps growing
Every subject searched joins one library. Search it by topic, level, country or institution, and export exactly the list you need.
Ready to use
Lists arrive as Excel files: a full version for review, or a mail-merge version with salutation, name and suggested role.
Who uses results like these
Anyone who needs to find, invite or work with the right experts in medicine, health and the life sciences.
Journals and publishers
Editors-in-chief, editorial boards, guest editors for special issues, peer reviewers, invited reviews and book authors.
Conferences and scientific events
Keynote speakers, session chairs, scientific committees, abstract reviewers, webinar faculty and award juries.
Pharmaceutical, biotech and medical device companies
Key opinion leaders, advisory boards, medical affairs outreach and clinical trial investigators.
Medical education and CME providers
Course faculty, programme directors, external examiners and subject experts for training material.
Universities and research institutes
Faculty recruitment, visiting professors, research collaborators, grant partners and thesis examiners.
Hospitals and health systems
Specialist recruitment, clinical advisors and members for guideline and quality committees.
Funders and foundations
Grant reviewers, expert panels and fellowship selection committees.
Government, policy and global health
Guideline panels, technical advisory groups and expert consultations, with balanced representation across regions.
Professional societies
New members, regional chapter leads, award and fellowship nominations, and meeting programmes.
Health-tech and AI companies
Clinical advisors, validation partners and specialists to review and test new products.
Market research and expert networks
Specialists for interviews, surveys and advisory panels in a precise field.
Medical communications and science journalism
Expert sources, authors and spokespeople who can speak with authority on a topic.
Legal and insurance
Independent medical experts and reviewers in a specific specialty.
Investors and consultancies
Scientific advisors and experts for due diligence on a new therapy, device or company.
Executive search in the life sciences
Senior candidates and rising specialists for leadership and scientific roles.
Non-profits and patient organisations
Scientific and medical advisory boards for a disease area or cause.
The quality of a journal, a conference or an advisory board is the quality of the people around the table.
- Invite at the right levelSenior leaders for the roles that need them, rising researchers where fresh energy matters — and no awkward mismatches.
- Spend time on people, not on searchingWeeks of looking up names one by one become a ready list in a day.
- Better repliesInvitations go to people who work on the topic now and are matched to a fitting role, so more of them are likely to say yes.
- Fair, global representationStrong researchers from every region and career stage are found, not only the most famous names.
- Decisions you can explainEvery level comes with a clear reason, so choices can be reviewed and defended.